CutStaff vs Make
Make (formerly Integromat) is a powerful, flexible visual builder for multi-step automations — if you have the time and skill to build and maintain scenarios. CutStaff is the done-for-you alternative: we build AI automations that reason over unstructured work, secure them, and run them for you.
| CutStaff | Make (Integromat) | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Done-for-you agency | Self-serve visual builder |
| Learning curve | None — we build it | Steep for complex scenarios |
| AI reasoning over unstructured data | Core capability | Add-on modules, you wire it |
| Maintenance & debugging | We monitor and fix | You own it |
| Security & compliance | Red-teamed, EU AI Act–ready | Your configuration |
| Best for | Outcomes without operational burden | Hands-on teams who like to build |
- No learning curve, no scenario maintenance — we design, build and run it.
- Built for work that needs AI judgment, not just deterministic steps.
- Security, guardrails and human approval are part of the build, not an afterthought.
- Monitored with a retainer so it keeps working as your systems change.
We'd rather you pick the right tool than the wrong us. Make (Integromat) wins when:
You have a technical builder in-house who enjoys it
Make is excellent if someone on your team wants to own automation as a craft. We're for teams who want the result, not the project.
Your scenarios are stable and well-understood
If the workflow rarely changes and doesn't need judgment, a Make scenario you set once can be enough.
Common questions.
Make is cheaper — why use an agency?
Make's subscription is cheap; the hidden cost is the hours to build, debug and maintain scenarios, plus the risk when they silently break. We remove that burden and add security and oversight you'd otherwise assemble yourself.
Can you take over our existing Make scenarios?
Often yes — we can audit what you've built, harden it, add AI reasoning and oversight where it helps, and take on monitoring so it stops being your problem.